Kabir, a patron saint of spiritual independence
The joy of uncertainty
Intelligent design is creeping me out
The journey between two steps
Meditation strengthens the brain
Universism makes front page of LA Times
The Neoplatonic Church
Mantra meditation: it’s all about melting
God, go to hell
Mantra meditation: what’s in a word?
Mantra meditation: does God make it better?
The Vatican gets it right (for once)
How writing a book rewrote me
Do you need to kill the Buddha?
Previously I’ve written:
“If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him!” Buddhists are fond of saying. And not just Buddha: also Jesus, Mohammed, Moses, Lao Tzu, Guru Nanak, every spiritual teacher. And not just these people are to be killed: also the concepts that comprise the shell of their teachings. For only then can the kernel of truth be released.
But is this really the case? Below you can read an email message from a person in the United Kingdom who argues otherwise. He, like me, is an initiate of Radha Soami Satsang Beas, also known as “Sant Mat.” The “satsangs” mentioned in his message are meetings of this group.
These are special words, unfamiliar to most people. But the questions being explored here are universal. To what extent does an evolving skeptic or agnostic need to disassociate from a religious organization to which he or she currently belongs? Can you discern grains of truth anywhere you look and find a way to separate them from ritualistic, dogmatic, fundamentalist chaff?
If you’re a questioning Christian and want to relate this message to your own experience, you could substitute “church” for “satsang,” “Christianity” for “Sant Mat,” “Christians” for “satsangis,” and so on. For the issues discussed below are common to anyone who feels an urge to move beyond the boundaries of a well-defined faith.
In Zen master Seung Sahn’s book “Dropping Ashes on the Buddha” he tells a student:
Throw away teaching, throw away everything. If you say you are not attached to methods of practice, this is being attached to method. If you cut off your attachment, then your words (“the real ‘I’ functions without thinking or talking”) are not necessary.
And also:
You say that you have no faith in your Buddha-nature. I too have no faith in my Buddha-nature. And I have no faith in Buddha or God or anything. If you have no faith, you must completely have no faith. You must not believe in anything at all…But when you see red, there is red; when you see white, there is only white. You must let go of both faith and non-faith. Things are only as they are.
Seung Sahn is fond of saying things like “If you understand yourself, I will hit you thirty times. And if you don’t understand yourself, I will still hit you thirty times.” When asked “Why?” he will say, “It is very cold today.”
Here’s a weather report from my British correspondent:
