Austere physicalism may sound unappealing, but actually it is a great philosophy of life

In line with the adage, great things come to those who wait, after plowing through some pretty scientifically dense chapters in Liam Graham's book, Physics Fixes All the Facts, I've reached concluding chapters that have a more philosophical tone to them. Which makes them more interesting to me, even though I realize that Graham had to build a foundation for his arguments before he could put some icing on the cake -- to mix a few metaphors. One of those chapters is called "Austere physicalism." This basically means that the only genuinely real entities are those described by fundamental physics,…

Here’s an argument for why everything is physics. Can you refute it?

Before I started reading Liam Graham's book, Physics Fixes All the Facts, from the title alone I thought I'd have problems with that provocative statement. But after reading 11 of the 16 chapters, I'm having difficulty finding holes in Graham's arguments. According to Graham, the main reason people think there's more to causal reality than physics is that novel phenomena (like consciousness) seem to emerge  from basic phenomena like the particles and forces known to physics. He doesn't deny that more is different, the key adage of those who worship at the scientific altar of emergence. But he doesn't believe…

The universe knows much more about itself than we humans know about the universe

Notwithstanding the title of this blog post, I don't really believe that the universe knows itself in the same way we do. That is, the universe isn't self-aware. I simply mean that the universe does its universe'ing thing with an ease and completeness that is far from the limited knowledge we humans have of the universe, laboriously arrived at over thousands of years. I've been listening to an interesting  conversation Sam Harris had with Alex O'Connor called "What is Experience?" that is on his Waking Up app. O'Connor is more open than Harris to the possibility that consciousness is inherent…

What’s the scientific source of everything in the world?

Creation is a perennial hot topic in both science and religion. In the Bible, God created the heavens and the earth. Other holy books have different explanations for how the world came to be. But they all suffer from a fatal flaw: they're unbelievable. Or so lacking in evidence they are the closest thing to unbelievable. Science does a lot better. Big bang cosmology provides a satisfying, albeit incomplete, answer to the creation question. Some 14 billion years ago our universe burst into existence in a unimaginable explosion of sorts, expanding from the size of a subatomic particle to the…

Eleatic Doctrine: what’s real either acts on something else or is acted upon

About a week ago I wrote "Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics?" The title of that blog post came from the title of an article in New Scientist that focused on the central messages of two books,  The Blind Spot by Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser, and Evan Thompson, and Physics Fixes All the Facts by Liam Graham. I've started reading each book. So far, I'm not finding a direct contradiction between them. The Blind Spot argues that science has gone awry by failing to recognize that everything we humans know and experience, naturally including scientific activities, rests…

Reality isn’t an abstraction. Religion is. Which is why religion isn’t real.

If something can't be perceived either directly (like rocks) or indirectly (like the subatomic particles that make up rocks), then there's no reason to believe that it is real -- where "real" means being part of the natural world. Many things exist without being real in that sense. Fairies. Unicorns. God. Heaven. These are mental concepts, abstractions. They exist in human minds, but not in the world at large. Yes, a concept can become real if there is evidence for it in the natural world. Einstein's theory of relativity moved from mathematical abstraction to reality when observations and experiments confirmed…

Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics?

The title of this blog post was the subtitle to an article by Karmela Padavic-Callaghan in the May 2, 2026 print edition of New Scientist, "The essence of reality." It became the title of the online article, which I've shared below. Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics? | New Scientist Here's how the article starts out: Imagine you could take a cosmic mixing bowl and cook up reality from scratch. It would be a strange kind of baking, with the end results including everything from space-time and satellites to cats and the cosmic web. But here’s the…

Searching for a deep meaning to the universe assumes there is one — which is dubious

My previous blog post, "What if there's no deep answers to cosmic questions because there's no deep truth," made me aware how dubious the assumption is that there's a deep meaning to the universe in addition to facts about the universe. Facts, after all, are much closer to being an objective quality of the universe than meaning is. Meaning is manufactured by human minds. Facts arise naturally from investigations into the nature of reality. As noted in the previous blog post, it seems entirely possible to know how the laws of nature operate without adding on a layer of deep…

What if there’s no deep answers to cosmic questions because there’s no deep truth?

When I used to give talks at meetings of my religious group, Eastern religion variety, almost always I'd use one of my favorite terms: ultimate reality. I loved those two words. They meant a lot to me, something to aim for, something to devote myself to, something to search for as a lifelong pursuit. Reality, I thought, was interesting. But ultimate reality -- that was the pot of gold at the end of the spiritual rainbow. While I didn't know what it was, I had some ideas in line, not surprisingly, with what the Eastern religion I belonged to for…

The world is what makes a difference between mere words and reality

"Water" can't quench our thirst because it is just a word, not H2O. So it is with language in general. "Hawaii" conjures up a pleasant sensation in me, but it is nothing like lying on a warm sunny beach listening to the waves. But when it comes to the supernatural side of religiosity, believers have to be content with words. For where is the reality that corresponds to "God," "heaven," "soul," and other terms that fill holy books and holy sermons, delighting readers and listeners with promises of supernatural experiences that are always something to look forward to, not a…

Buddhists are wrong about impermanence. One thing is permanent: existence.

As evidenced by my previous post, Buddhists talk a lot about impermanence. So far as I can tell, in Buddhism nothing is considered to be permanent. Everything arises from causes and conditions. Everything lacks inherent existence, which means existing as and for itself. That's the nature of emptiness, basically, interdependence. Even emptiness is empty of inherent existence. Yet... My experience tells me that even though impermanence rules the roost of existence, there's one thing that is permanent -- the roost itself, existence. This is one of my favorite subjects, closely related to, if not identical with, the classic question, Why…

We are all aliens to each other, since we view the world from different perspectives

In particle physicist Daniel Whiteson’s book, Do Aliens Speak Physics?, he speaks about how if alien beings came to Earth and we tried to communicate with them, almost certainly this would be very difficult, given how differently they likely would perceive reality. And without common perceptions, understanding is hard to come by. Assuming, as we progress along our Drake equation, that visiting aliens are mathematical, scientific, and communicative, the next hurdle to a full scientific mind meld is whether we are looking at the same Universe. If aliens have different senses, they will perceive different bits of the Universe --…

“Do Aliens Speak Physics?” speaks to the nature of science and human assumptions

If you want a synopsis of particle physicist Daniel Whiteson's book, Do Aliens Speak Physics?, an article by Whiteson in the March 14, 2026 issue of New Scientist provides an overview of his provocative question. Here's a PDF of the article. It starts out this way: Would aliens do physics, or is science a human invention? | New Scientist Modern physics offers a remarkable lens on reality. In just over a century, it has decoded the architecture of atoms, traced the early history of the universe and produced laws that seem to hold everywhere, from Earth’s crust to distant galaxies. It is…

“Good enough” can be a wiser choice than “absolute best”

When is good enough, well, good enough? As compared to the absolute best. Quite often. If not usually. Because holding out for the absolute best brings with it some definite problems. Such as, all the effort it takes to evaluate the merits of every possible option available to us. And the difficulty of arriving at criteria that would allow us to decide which of those options is #1, the best choice of all. Today The Atlantic, which I subscribe to online, had an interesting article, The Secret to Success is 'Monotasking,'  In other words, focusing on one thing at a…

“Each moment is the universe” — a great way of viewing time

For much of my life I've been consumed by a sense that I needed to use my time carefully. Partly this arose from a 35 year dedication to an Eastern philosophy that taught the purposes of human life were, first, self-realization, which led to the ultimate purpose, god-realization. Meaning, after realizing ourself as immaterial soul, we then could make a supernatural journey to eternal existence with God. Whew! I feel kind of exhausted just describing what used to be how I viewed the purpose of my life. Serious stuff. The course of my life after death depended on how well…

Imagining the impossible is a cool feature of human minds, but it creates philosophical enigmas

I'm enjoying Michael Pollan's new book, A World Appears: A Journey Into Consciousness. My first post about it came after I'd finished the Introduction, also called The Wager. Now I've read the first chapter, Sentience. After that comes Feeling, Thought, Self, and The Cave. While I don't expect Pollan to clear up the mysteries surrounding consciousness in his book, going along with him on his journey will be enjoyable. He's got a knack for making complex ideas understandable, and for describing fresh takes on old problems. That's what I'm going to focus on in this post, a fresh take on…

All knowledge is a product of human consciousness, not reality itself

Having just written quite a few blog posts about In Search of Now: The Science of the Present Moment by Jo Marchant, a fascinating book that delves into how physics, neuroscience, and philosophy look upon our sense of time, and indeed reality itself, I'm equally enthused about diving into consciousness -- the subject of Michael Pollan's new book, A World Appears: A Journey Into Consciousness. I enjoy books by skilled science writers who take a broader look at some subject than a specialist in that field would. For one thing, science writers usually are more adept at making a subject…

We need a philosophical and spiritual Copernican revolution

The Copernican Revolution in astronomy corrected the mistaken belief that our Earth was the center of the solar system. Instead, the Sun took its rightful place there in the minds of humans. That was one step in understanding our correct place in the cosmos. Another came when astronomers realized that what seemed to be objects within our Milky Way galaxy actually were other galaxies, each containing tens or hundreds of billions of stars. Now we know there are hundreds of billions of galaxies in the universe. All that should make us feel very small in the grand scheme of things.…

QBism is the most mind-blowing scientific view of reality I’ve ever encountered

What is reality? This is a really important question. Maybe the most important question of all. It's also a really difficult question to answer. Humans have been attempting this throughout recorded history. And probably long before, extending to the first time one of our prehistoric ancestors looked upon the world and thought something like, What's this all about? Most of us, me certainly included, either consciously or unconsciously view reality as being comprised of two main branches: objective and subjective. This was a focus of the first book I wrote, God's Whisper, Creation's Thunder, where I attempted to relate principles…

Reality is different from how we humans perceive reality

In my previous post about In Search of Now: The Science of the Present Moment by Jo Marchant, I focused on her totally scientific observation that according to Einstein's extremely well proven relativity theory, the past, present, and future are all the same -- in the sense that each is part of a single "block universe" in which every event, from the motion of a single particle to the movement of a gigantic galaxy, is captured in a four dimensional space-time continuum that simply is. Of course, this perspective is utterly unlike how the world, and our life, appears to…