Guide to creating scientific controversy

Don't like facts? Hate science? There's a handy four-step guide to generating your very own scientific controversy. I think some religiously-minded commenters on this blog already know #3.

When people point out that the facts don’t back up your claim, ignore them. As those people get angry and shouty at you, smugly say, “They’re persecuting me! They’re so closed-minded that they won’t let anyone ask questions!” Bonus points for saying that science is now a religion.


Discover more from Church of the Churchless

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 Comments

  1. sapient

    Brian,
    There is one another trend also, backing your claims with wrong scientific claims but with a straight face, among the audience who doesn’t understand science 🙂 See this video
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0c5yClip4o
    Your brain will hurt after watching it. There is no mass in universe!! Poor Einstein!

  2. sapient, I managed to watch two minutes of the video before I felt my head beginning to explode, so I stopped. Of course, since there is no mass in the universe, nothing would have exploded, I guess. Or I could have taken a homeopathic treatment, which probably would have solved all my problems — including Exploding Brain From Idiocy Syndrome.

  3. Jen

    “Science now a religion”? Perhaps it is more accurate to say that, for some people, science can become more of a belief system. This generates reassurance for intellectual understanding of the mysteries of the universe.
    No need to defend science but be wary of the personal belief systems which can keep us stuck in what we are comfortable with and stop further development in the search for truth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *