There’s no free will, so you’re unable to believe me
Bad news: I’m going to die. Good news: I’ll be nirvana!
Buddhism says I’m a soul-less Heraclitean river. Cool!
Everybody wants to be something. That's so much better than being nothing. (Assuming "nothing" is something you can be.)
It seems like I'm some sort of self. After all, I'm fond of saying stuff like "Personally, I think…" and "When I look within myself, I feel…" But Buddhism, along with neuroscience, see here and here, deny that us humans have/are some sort of unchanging permanent self.
Or soul. Which religions consider to be the same thing as a self, just spiritual, immaterial, divine, eternal.
Whatever we call it, self or soul, the big question is whether our essence is like a diamond, indestructible and unchanging, or like a river, flowing and everaltering. The scientific evidence points riverward.
As does mainstream Buddhism, according to Owen Flanagan in his fascinating book, "The Bodhisattva's Brain: Buddhism Naturalized," where he seeks to understand what Buddhism is like without all the weird supernatural stuff.
I should explain what a personBuddha is and is not, and how a personBuddha is possible given that there are no selves. Although Buddhists are said to deny that there are persons and selves or persons with selves, this is not really so. Or better, it is so, but the devil is in the details.
When properly interpreted, Buddhists believe that there are persons, and that talk of persons and selves is harmless so long as we recognize that person and self refer to something, a pattern that is conventionally useful but that does not name anything "ultimate" or "really real."
Some kinds of persons, eternal persons, and some kind of selves, indestructible transcendental egos or immortal souls, do not exist at all, but Heraclitean selves do exist. Heraclitean selves are like Heraclitean rivers where both subsist in a Heraclitean universe.
So everything is changing. Including me, you, beliefs, brains, selves, Mt. Everest, ants, galaxies, subatomic particles, who is ahead in the latest presidential poll. Heraclitus sure seems to have gotten that right.
If we hope to base our happiness, our well-being, our satisfaction, on something immutable, unchanging, and eternal — that hope is going to be still unfulfilled on our death bed. Better to accept that we're all Heraclitean rivers in a Heraclitean universe.
(Scholarly analysis follows)
