Posted inReality Science

Eleatic Doctrine: what’s real either acts on something else or is acted upon

About a week ago I wrote "Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics?" The title of that blog post came from the title of an article in New Scientist that focused on the central messages of two books,  The Blind Spot by Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser, and Evan Thompson, and Physics Fixes All the Facts by Liam Graham. I've started reading each book. So far, I'm not finding a direct contradiction between them. The Blind Spot argues that science has gone awry by failing to recognize that everything we humans know and experience, naturally including scientific activities, rests…
8
Posted inAtheism

Five reasons why I’m happy being an atheist

For 35 years I believed in God, an Eastern religion variety. Or maybe I just believed in believing in God. Can't be sure. Probably the truth is that I bounced back and forth between a belief in God, and a belief that it was good to believe in God, even if I didn't truly believe in God. Okay, that probably is clear as mud. So let's move on to a simpler topic -- the 20 or so subsequent years when I didn't believe in God. At least the sort of God that occupied my mind during those 35 believing years.…
10
Posted inReality Religions Science

Reality isn’t an abstraction. Religion is. Which is why religion isn’t real.

If something can't be perceived either directly (like rocks) or indirectly (like the subatomic particles that make up rocks), then there's no reason to believe that it is real -- where "real" means being part of the natural world. Many things exist without being real in that sense. Fairies. Unicorns. God. Heaven. These are mental concepts, abstractions. They exist in human minds, but not in the world at large. Yes, a concept can become real if there is evidence for it in the natural world. Einstein's theory of relativity moved from mathematical abstraction to reality when observations and experiments confirmed…
8
Posted inReality Science

Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics?

The title of this blog post was the subtitle to an article by Karmela Padavic-Callaghan in the May 2, 2026 print edition of New Scientist, "The essence of reality." It became the title of the online article, which I've shared below. Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics? | New Scientist Here's how the article starts out: Imagine you could take a cosmic mixing bowl and cook up reality from scratch. It would be a strange kind of baking, with the end results including everything from space-time and satellites to cats and the cosmic web. But here’s the…
5
Posted inTaoism/Tai Chi

“The Tao is Silent” is my favorite Taoist book, because it makes no sense

In my bookcase I have an entire shelf devoted to Taoism. Or Daoism. Take your pick. There's quite a few translations of the Tao Te Ching. There's many books about Taoist philosophy. Modern takes on Taoism. And my favorite book of all, Raymond Smullyan's The Tao is Silent. The back cover says "Raymond M. Smullyan is an internationally known mathematical logician." Indeed, there's a lot of books by him on Amazon. Most are heavily mathematical. The Tao is Silent is the only one I'd have a chance of understanding. But I can't understand it either. Which is why I like…
7
Posted inReality Universe

Searching for a deep meaning to the universe assumes there is one — which is dubious

My previous blog post, "What if there's no deep answers to cosmic questions because there's no deep truth," made me aware how dubious the assumption is that there's a deep meaning to the universe in addition to facts about the universe. Facts, after all, are much closer to being an objective quality of the universe than meaning is. Meaning is manufactured by human minds. Facts arise naturally from investigations into the nature of reality. As noted in the previous blog post, it seems entirely possible to know how the laws of nature operate without adding on a layer of deep…
9
Posted inReality Universe

What if there’s no deep answers to cosmic questions because there’s no deep truth?

When I used to give talks at meetings of my religious group, Eastern religion variety, almost always I'd use one of my favorite terms: ultimate reality. I loved those two words. They meant a lot to me, something to aim for, something to devote myself to, something to search for as a lifelong pursuit. Reality, I thought, was interesting. But ultimate reality -- that was the pot of gold at the end of the spiritual rainbow. While I didn't know what it was, I had some ideas in line, not surprisingly, with what the Eastern religion I belonged to for…
8
Posted inReality Religions

The world is what makes a difference between mere words and reality

"Water" can't quench our thirst because it is just a word, not H2O. So it is with language in general. "Hawaii" conjures up a pleasant sensation in me, but it is nothing like lying on a warm sunny beach listening to the waves. But when it comes to the supernatural side of religiosity, believers have to be content with words. For where is the reality that corresponds to "God," "heaven," "soul," and other terms that fill holy books and holy sermons, delighting readers and listeners with promises of supernatural experiences that are always something to look forward to, not a…
18
Posted inBuddhism

More Zen pseudo-wisdom from Dainin Katagiri

Carrying on from my previous post where I criticized what Dainin Katagiri said in some concluding chapters of his book Each Moment Is the Universe: Zen and the Way of Being Time, here I'll share some additional criticisms now that I've finished reading the book. While naturally I'll focus on what Katagiri said, his confusing, non-sensical statements are reflections of general problems I have with similar books about spirituality and religion. I'm open to persuasive evidence and arguments for things that I used to believe in, but no longer do. Like, the existence of God, life after death. immaterial consciousness,…
17
Posted inBuddhism

Bodhisattva B.S. is an annoying part of Buddhism

I'm finding more not to like in the concluding chapters of  Each Moment Is the Universe: Zen and the Way of Being Time, by Dainin Katagiri. In my previous post I criticized Katagiri for buying into the Buddhist notion of past lives, which reeks of unproven supernaturalism. In some reading I did in the book today, I came across another subject that, thankfully, I've rarely encountered in other books about Zen Buddhism: bodhisattvas. Katagiri said: There are two ways of manifesting your life every day: there is an ordinary life and a bodhisattva life. The ordinary type of life is…
9
Posted inBuddhism

Buddhist belief in past lives is ridiculous, especially for Zen Buddhism

While there's a lot to like about Buddhism -- of any religion it comes closest to being in tune with modern neuroscience -- the supernatural aspects of Buddhism turn me off. Like believing in past lives, whether this be called rebirth, reincarnation, or some other name. Buddhist scholars twist themselves into logical knots when trying to explain how it is that Buddhism, which embraces impermanence and the lack of an enduring self, can also assert that after death, some sort of essence remains of a person that ends up becoming a new person (or animal?). I much prefer secular sorts…
46
Posted inAtheism Delusions

What I used to think was God’s grace now seems just like ordinary luck

There's lots of reasons I'm happier being an atheist than a religious believer. One reason is that I much prefer feeling like an ordinary person rather than a special "chosen" child of God. Or of a guru, which amounted to the same thing in the Eastern religion I belonged to for 35 years. (Radha Soami Satsang Beas taught that the guru is God in Human Form.) Among many weird things that I used to do was thank god/guru for mundane things like finding a parking space in a crowded downtown, or being met with a series of green lights when…
12
Posted inBuddhism Mindfulness Uncategorized

Being fully absorbed in an activity is enlightenment

Usually I hate to stop reading a book after I've started it. Unless it is really bad. I figure that even though I'm not enjoying the book very much, there will be something in pages to come that I'll learn or be entertained by. So I'll read more rapidly, less carefully, as I make my way further into the book. This just happened to me with Each Moment Is the Universe: Zen and the Way of Being Time, by Dainin Katagiri. I go hot and cold with this book as Katagiri shifts from interesting practical advice about living to conceptual Buddhist…
5
Posted inReality

Buddhists are wrong about impermanence. One thing is permanent: existence.

As evidenced by my previous post, Buddhists talk a lot about impermanence. So far as I can tell, in Buddhism nothing is considered to be permanent. Everything arises from causes and conditions. Everything lacks inherent existence, which means existing as and for itself. That's the nature of emptiness, basically, interdependence. Even emptiness is empty of inherent existence. Yet... My experience tells me that even though impermanence rules the roost of existence, there's one thing that is permanent -- the roost itself, existence. This is one of my favorite subjects, closely related to, if not identical with, the classic question, Why…
8
Posted inBuddhism

Turn toward true impermanence

With some books, I feel comfortable stating their message in my own words. With other books, I don't. Zen titles often fall into that category, because they tend toward subtlety, paradox, indirectness, metaphor. In that spirit, here's some quotations from Each Moment Is the Universe: Zen and the Way of Being Time, by Dainin Katagiri. I resonate with each of them, even though I may not agree fully with some of them. (Zazen is Zen meditation.) It is the momentary structure of time that makes you talk to yourself that way. Impermanence creates a gap that makes your mind blink,…
No Comments