Alan Watts talks about the source of spiritual authority

Over on my "Let's add a new L-word to 'Who is the guru?' possibilities" post, William left a comment today:

Hi Brian
I was listening to a talk on the topic of What is a Guru? by Alan Watts. You may well find it interesting. Here's the link that will bring you to the pertinent part of that talk. https://youtu.be/sAq2NY0Tjf8?t=1m54s

Alan Watts

Since I enjoy reading Watts' books, saw him speak in person back in the 1960's, and like his audio recordings, I watched about half of the You Tube video today.

Here's the link William sent, which starts at about the two minute mark.

 

I resonate with almost everything I heard Watts say, agreeing that the only authority a guru, master, or other religious personage has flows from the devotees who choose to elevate that person to a position of spiritual leadership.

Otherwise, where could any authority come from?

There aren't qualifications for becoming a guru, as there are for professions such as medicine, law, engineering, and so on. Anyone can claim to be a spiritual adept. Usually it is very difficult, if not impossible, to find objective evidence that what the "guru" claims to know about the cosmos is actually true, and/or that the guru can do what he or she claims, supernaturally speaking.

So Buyer Beware is excellent advice for anyone looking to purchase some spiritual authority.


Discover more from Church of the Churchless

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

10 Comments

  1. 777


    The world proves very much the opposite
    S/HE who can give
    the sweet Sound above the eyes is the Guru.
    777

  2. 777

    “””” guru” claims to know about the cosmos is actually true, and/or that the guru can do what he or she claims, supernaturally speaking. “”
    This is the opposite also
    Many Gurus know nothing more than what their own Master is giving Them on a need to know basis
    Also and ALWAYS are the first , the Last
    777
    They claim greatly about their Master and nothing about themselves

  3. Juan

    They claim greatly about their Master and nothing about themselves…
    the same way they encourage their disciples as well to make the same claims.

  4. Jen

    “… the only authority a guru, master, or other religious personage has flows from the devotees who choose to elevate that person to a position of spiritual leadership.
    Otherwise, where could any authority come from?”
    c’mon Brian, you’re grasping at straws here, you know very well that each Sant Mat guru takes their authority from their predecessor.
    You spent more time with Charan than most of us westerners and surely you remember his humility, he never claimed any kind of spiritual power. Yes, the devotees put him on a pedestal but thats their problem. He never wanted to be worshipped. Remember Charan Singh – The Way of Surrender.

  5. Jen, that’s my point. There was no evidence, no proof, no objective reason to believe that Charan Singh was “god in human form.” The guru’s devotees believed this on their own. They were the ones who gave the guru his spiritual authority.
    Sure, he was appointed by his predecessor. But the same applies to the entire lineage of a succession of gurus. There is no reason for anyone to grant them spiritual authority. They don’t take a god-realization exam, like a medical student takes before qualifying to become a physician.
    It is all belief. It is all assumptions. If a guru’s devotees stopped giving him or her spiritual authority, the guru would have nothing to make him or her a guru.

  6. 777

    +
    Brian, . . anyone else you would have preferred ??
    Take your time
    777

  7. 777, I don’t understand your question. If you mean, preferred a different guru, that doesn’t make any sense. It’s like asking if I would have preferred a different woman than my first wife. But I married her, not anyone else. How do I know what it would have been like to have married someone else?

  8. Jen

    Brian, yes it is assumptions and belief and I would add projection and perhaps recognition.
    Do we see in the Master a glimpse of who and what we really are, or who we want to be? Is he purely an example, a guide to what we can become? Are we attracted by his humility, kindness, patience, compassion and then those very attributes grow within us. So many questions I ask myself as to why I was attracted to this path of Sant Mat.
    Then comes the battle with the mind which does not like discipline, adhering to the rules etc, its not easy. And so many doubts (and annoying religious type satsangis to contend with lol).
    So becoming a recluse, observing the world and thinking that its getting more crazy, I find the best way to be is ‘unknowing’ and letting go, especially where beliefs are concerned. This is what I have in common with you and I appreciate your blog. Your walks in nature with the dog and moments of enlightenment 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *