Worrying about the future distracts us from enjoying the present moment

In my previous post, “Not-knowing is wise, because we know so much less than what we think we know,” I said:

But it seems to me that a major source of my customary feeling of knowing what’s going on in my life comes from self-talk derived from a basic assumption that what I think will happen, actually will happen.

Meaning, I wake up, envision what is on the day’s to-do list, and have a comforting feeling that I know how things are going to happen today. Problem is, that rarely happens. There’s always surprises. Something else comes up. I change my mind. An unexpected phone call, email, or whatever pushes me in a different direction.

I’m terrible at predicting what is going to happen. But I constantly tell myself, “This is what’s going to happen.”

My worries about the future are similar. I’m continually visualizing bad things that could happen to me, to my wife, to our dog, to our house, to our city, to our state, to our nation, to the world. Cancer. Disability. Earthquake. War. Financial collapse. Climate catastrophe. To name but a few.

Of course, some worrying is a good thing. If I didn’t worry about my car breaking down, I wouldn’t get the recommended maintenance done. If I didn’t worry about a heart attack, I wouldn’t be so careful about exercising, eating right, and getting an annual checkup.

But I often take worrying to an undesirable extreme. As I said in the previous post, I’m terrible at predicting what is going to happen. Or how I’ll feel about what happens, even if I’ve predicted it correctly.

When I worked in health planning and policy analysis, which at one point entailed being the executive director of a bioethics organization, I recall an interesting study that asked people how they’d feel if they had a serious spinal cord injury and lost the use of their arms and legs, becoming quadriplegic. Many, if not most, said that life wouldn’t be worth living.

However, when actual quadriplegics were asked if they were pleased with life, the answer was overwhelmingly “yes.” Which shows that often we’re terrible at predicting how we’ll feel if such-and-such occurs.

Thus this advice from Robert Saltzman in his book, Depending on no-thing, makes sense to me, even if I’m not able to follow that advice much of the time. It’s in the form of a response to someone who asked a question about transporting their attention from the future to the present.

There is no future. What you are calling “future” is imaginary. Not somewhat imaginary, but totally and completely imaginary. You may stop breathing in the very next moment, and if that were to happen — as one day it will, since everything alive must die — every bit of your fantasized future would have been entirely non-existent. This is obvious and undeniable. What, you might ask yourself, stops you from accepting the truth of it right now?

I don’t know how to help you see that, from my perspective, what you are calling “future” is constructed entirely of your own anxieties, replayed again and again like a low-grade horror movie. You see that or you don’t. If you see it, then you are able to say:

Wow! All that grief about what bad things might or could happen is just a story I keep telling myself. Actually I have no idea what will happen, or how I will feel even in the very next moment, to say nothing about the fantasized far away future. So obsession with possible catastrophe is just a form of mental masturbation that distracts me from the only life I really have, or ever will have, which is here and now.

A few pages further on Saltzman says:

There’s nothing wrong in imagining a future, as long as the images remain on the practical level where they can function, as you say, to further survival. That, after all, is how DNA-encoded traits evolve and persist in the genome: if they serve survival, the bodies that bear them live long enough to reproduce them sexually.

Now, if I plant some beans and tend to the young shoots with weeding and watering, I may do it because I imagine a future in which I harvest beans and eat them to survive. Most likely, that imagining of the future was strengthened with the shift from a hunter-gatherer culture to agriculture; and presently to money-culture, in which present actions may bear financial dividends. So, if my imagining helps the beans to flourish, and I get to eat them later, mazel tov. [congratulations]

A problem arises when the useful faculty of imagining the future jumps the shark, and rather than being used to further material goals — for which it may have some utility — instead purports to predict what I might think or how I might feel at some supposed future time. Only when the so-called future remains psychologically unknown and blowing in the wind, as Bob Dylan put it, does one enjoy the freedom to experience in its fullness and unrepeatable essence whatever comprises this moment.

This is what artists and lovers know in their bones.


Discover more from Church of the Churchless

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 Comments

  1. sant64

    Oy vey, a sakh (khand) narishkay.

  2. umami

    I’m serious, Now is imaginary too. I know it goes against live-in-the-moment Zen orthodoxy, but why stop at no-Self?

    As Self is an “internal” construct, Now is an “external” construct. Both are illusory. What sense does Now make even from a scientific perspective, when we know that time is relativistic?

    Yes, I think we blundered on a new doctrine and a new line of contemplation, no-Now. In anyone’s reading of Buddhism or mysticism, is it ever made so explicit?

  3. Ron E.

    “Worrying about the future distracts us from enjoying the present moment.”

    I’d say this is quite true; whether it is just worrying or just simply avoiding the present moment through believing stories that promise some otherworldly hoped-for better moment. (N.B. Which has nothing to do with day-to-day planning.)

    Brian’s quote from Robert Saltzman. “There is no future. What you are calling “future” is imaginary. Not somewhat imaginary, but totally and completely imaginary.” And: – “So obsession with possible catastrophe [or its opposite] is just a form of mental masturbation that distracts me from the only life I really have, or ever will have, which is here and now.”

    And from Neuroscientist Abhijit Naskar, the author of “Love, God & Neurons: Memoir of a scientist who found himself by getting lost.” He said, “Time is basically an illusion created by the mind to aid in our sense of temporal presence in the vast ocean of space. Without the neurons to create a virtual perception of the past and the future based on all our experiences, there is no actual existence of the past and the future. All that there is, is the present.”

  4. Ronald

    When things are going so perfect is when you should start to worry. It won’t ruin the moment. It just prepares you for the next moment. It’s common sense and human nature to worry. Anyone that says they don’t worry is lying and there lays the root of everyone’s problem. They can’t handle the truth. Handle the truth and you don’t have any problem worth complaining about. But it’s certainly okay to complain about liars!

  5. Spencer Tepper

    Past, present and future are arbitrary distinctions. The only life you have is what is going on in your head. Make it a pleasant place. Have good company there, and feel free to hand your good friend any issues that concern you. There is real power in a good friendship.

    At least one of three things will happen. Maybe all three.

    First, you will stop worrying. Love is a much better state to spend your time in.

    You may be inspired with a good idea.

    You may realize how well all things work together, past, present and future, when you are not alone.

    You need not be afraid of anything, in good company.

  6. Appreciative Reader

    My 2c these two recent posts and discussions about “Now”:

    I’m far less impressed with the apparent profundity on this of the likes of Krishnamurti and Eckhart Tolle and Nisargadatta and the Zen types, than I used to be one time, than I used to be maybe 5 or 10 years ago. Here’s why:

    Remember Shamil Chandaria’s excellent expositions on the brain model thingie, as well as similar discussions on this, that were covered here in great detail? The point of it all is this, it seems to me: That while it is true that the past is filtered through the mind, and therefore our appreciation of the past is questionable on many counts; but equally, our appreciation of the present is filtered through the model that our brain puts up for us, so that there is no reason to imagine that our appreciation of the present somehow stands out as “100% correct”, or “direct”, or any such thing.

    As far as dwelling-in-the-now exercises: I believe they do have therapeutic value. They do make for mental health. They do assist in first-hand exploration of our mind. And they are oftentimes pleasurable, in and of themselves, at least to those so inclined (including yours truly).

    But beyond that, the whole complex rigmarole spun out by the likes of Tolle, and Jiddu K, and the Zen types, and the rest of them? The ultra-deep profundity of “dwelling in the now” that is hinted at, and sometimes directly claimed, by them? I’d take them with a pinch of salt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *