In particle physicist Daniel Whiteson’s book, Do Aliens Speak Physics?, he speaks about how if alien beings came to Earth and we tried to communicate with them, almost certainly this would be very difficult, given how differently they likely would perceive reality. And without common perceptions, understanding is hard to come by.
Assuming, as we progress along our Drake equation, that visiting aliens are mathematical, scientific, and communicative, the next hurdle to a full scientific mind meld is whether we are looking at the same Universe. If aliens have different senses, they will perceive different bits of the Universe — which will naturally lead them to ask different questions about it.
…What’s more, our senses don’t influence only what we see and what questions we ask about it; they guide the explanations we devise. Our familiar experience supplies us with tools for describing the unfamiliar. Science is an attempt to explain the unfamiliar in terms of the familiar, the invisible in terms of the visible, like intellectual night-vision goggles. Without a shared vocabulary for experience of the world, will we find it difficult to share each other’s understanding of the Universe?
I’m about halfway through watching F1, the Apple movie about Formula One racing. The fastest cars on the planet are being driven around racetracks by people with an astounding degree of ability. Their reflexes and split-second decision making are far beyond the capabilities of ordinary humans. I can try to imagine what it is like to drive a Formula One race car at over 200 mph, but there’s no way I can experience what a Formula One driver does.
And we’re both human beings, with similar bodies and organs of perception — eyes, ears, touch, etc. Whiteson writes:
If we are going to understand alien science, we need to know more than just what they sense — the raw information — we need to know what it’s like to have those senses. If an alien can see in the infrared or can taste neutrinos, what is their mental picture of the world outside their head? How does that interpretative step affect the science they do?
This is a difficult problem, even for understanding other Earth creatures. What is it like to be a bat or a person who sincerely enjoys deep-dish pizza? Does a sea scallop, which possesses hundreds of eyes that respond to light but lacks the neural power to process that into an image, actually see? Spiders have two different kinds of eyes; do they see one image, or two? Does an octopus with a distributed nervous system and semi-independent limbs have nine mental pictures of its environment?
…When you sip a nice wine, you describe it in terms of the familiar flavors you detect. In the same way, physics seeks to understand the unknown, but the stories we tell about our new knowledge are expressed in terms of the known. Because we can build new eyeballs, but we can’t build new brains. So far.
My mystical experiences are pretty much limited to the psychedelic trips I took in college way back in the 1960s. Thanks to LSD and mescaline, I was able to perceive reality in a very different manner from everyday consciousness. At least, my everyday consciousness. I’m open to the possibility that other people have the ability to see the world in a fashion that is equally at odds from how I do, or how most people do.
Really, it’s impossible for anyone to know what is like to be us, because there’s only one person in the entire cosmos who knows what it is like to be me or you: me or you. Like the scientists in the quotation above, we try to use our understanding of how the world appears to us to grasp how the world appears to other people. But I have no way of knowing if my wife looks upon reality in a markedly different manner than I do.
So in a sense we are alien beings, inhabiting our own private planet with a population of one. Sometimes we find other people who appear to be so similar to us, we feel a marvelous intimacy with them. Perhaps this is one way to describe love: two alien beings who are able to bridge their differences and create a closely shared planetary life together.
Thankfully, we humans are highly social creatures. We find ways to communicate through language, music, art, gestures, poetry, science, athletics, and so many other ways. We struggle to understand and to be understood. Always imperfectly. Yet never in vain.
Discover more from Church of the Churchless
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Well here’s something I find helpful because I didn’t used to even know what a narcissist was and once you find out you realize many things and one is that a real narcissist won’t even say the word narcissist because don’t forget from their perspective there’s only two entities , them and everybody else . It pains Gurinder to have anyone else on stage with him but he was in pain anyway.
https://youtu.be/NQF1WP_i0mE?si=TFlGjRRl746z2GhM
I wonder just how differently each of us views the world. I understand how different creatures view their world depending on their dominant senses. Some use the sense of smell; others sight and also hearing (bats). Then there is evidence that many animals, including sheep, recognise faces; if so, they must share similarities in brain structure with ours. Does this mean that they ‘see’ images similar to us?
When we look out into the garden or park, do we all see the same? A friend of mine is colour blind, so his experience of colour is different to mine. Even so, we both see, hear, smell, and feel the same things; the only difference I can tell is that we overlay what we experience with our own ideas, opinions, and particular knowledge. I, for instance, see an Elm tree or a Spotted Woodpecker; he just sees a tree or a bird, having no knowledge of such things. But we both experience the same things, only differentiated by the overlay of past knowledge – or concepts.
I can appreciate (hypothetically) that beings from other planetary systems, probably with differently evolved entire organisms and senses, perhaps like a bat, will experience things quite differently. But I wonder whether humans with differently wired brains – say autism or psychopathy – still view the external world the same as me, and whether it is that they just interpret the experienced object differently?
Do the people who see the world in a fashion that is equally at odds from how I do, only differentiated by virtue of the concepts each of us project, therefore, seeing or experiencing is the same for everyone – barring aliens of course!
Trump is the best thing that ever happened to Democrats is one way of looking at it US Senator Talarico.
Trump already admitted he’s going to hell so he’s got nothing to lose at this point. I think he’s a Russian cell. He’s more Russian than he is American because you are what you eat. With a strong Mussolini jawline and a gold-plated toilet seat that the CIA would love to hoard. Aliens are just future humankind that learned how to time travel and spent a lot of time underground in the volcanoes and under the sea after the Apocalypse looking at screens and inventing things. Jeff Bezos and Zuckerberg in the future. There’s no life nowhere out there. This is it. Beyond here lies nothing !
Very intresting observation.
No There No Here
Here where is their
Gurinder Singh can’t sing and after what happened to him initially he decided to leave two gurus in his wake at his wake. So you get to choose and we never had a choice because I would have just looked in the mirror and said no not for me. Tough guys don’t dance either.
And if you don’t see me on the flyer then that means the job is actually turned downable and Gurinder could have walked away at any time like I did. It’s coming to light that Charan Singh had a first choice who turned it down before this other Baba accepted. Not anyone’s first choice by any means.
In Vedic and Hindu scriptures, the “nameless region” or absolute state is often referred to as Parabrahman—the Supreme Truth that transcends all names, forms, and attributes (\(Nirguna\) and \(Nirakara\)). Beyond the material universes lies the ultimate transcendental reality, such as Vaikuntha or Goloka.However, the specific, formalized concept of a “nameless region” (often called Anami Lok or Anami Desh) is more distinct to Sant Mat and Radhasoami traditions, which are rooted in esoteric teachings and the philosophy of the Vedas and Upanishads.
This is where I have been residing for the last few years ( in Earth time).
Because like my friend Lowell George used to say ” if you ain’t sharing you ain’t caring “.
Brian, I would request you to have a look at Sri Sri Ravi Shankar. His Ashram “The Art Of Living” is in Bangalore. Sri Ravi shankar has lots of vlogs on YouTube too.