Posted inUniverse
If nothing is truly alive, maybe everything is
I'm not sure how I feel about Ferris Babr's opinion piece in the New York Times, "Why Nothing is Truly Alive." On the whole, I think I like the idea. Why so much ambivalence? Why is it so difficult for scientists to cleanly separate the living and nonliving and make a final decision about ambiguously animate viruses? Because they have been trying to define something that never existed in the first place. Here is my conclusion: Life is a concept, not a reality. To better understand this argument, it’s helpful to distinguish between mental models and pure concepts. Sometimes the…
