Seeing a video of a woman reading from Life is Fair got me thinking about how I’ve changed since I wrote those words

First time for everything, since I’m pretty sure I never saw a video of someone reading from one of my books until a few days ago, when someone emailed me a link to an Instagram post of a woman reading from the book I wrote in the 1990s, Life is Fair.

The book was published in 1999 by Radha Soami Satsang Beas, an Indian religious organization I belonged to for 35 years. It’s still being sold by RSSB, with this description.

The mystics tell us that the law of cause and effect is the universal principle of justice that holds this creation together. This book clearly and logically presents the rationale of why “life is fair,” and how, indeed, we get what we deserve. It uses the example of what we eat to follow the workings of this law of cause and effect, introducing the importance of vegetarianism. Essays and three short stories by well-known American authors are included to sensitize the reader to the sanctity of life and the logic behind vegetarianism. The book is also illustrated with cartoons and drawings about the law of cause and effect and the vegetarian diet.

After seeing the Instagram post, I picked up a copy of Life is Fair and thumbed through the pages, looking for the passage that she’d read aloud. That took a while, since it was on page 178 of the 252 page book. These were the two paragraphs.

Right thoughts and actions are akin to putting money in a savings account. Wrong thoughts and actions are akin to running up debts. The current balance, or net worth, determines the general thrust of our life.

That is, an excess of good karma makes us wealthy. Not always in a material sense, since true wealth is measured not in dollars but in peace of mind, happiness, health, a sense of meaning and purpose, and in one’s capacity to love and be loved. Similarly, an excess of bad karma makes us poor. This is the poverty that is as likely to afflict the inhabitants of mansions and palaces as the dwellers of mud huts and lean-tos. It is a poverty of spirit, marked by despair, loneliness, depression, anxiety, disease, and lack of purpose.

I vaguely remember writing those words. I clearly remember writing the entire book, because it took so long and required so much effort. But the person who wrote the passage above isn’t the same person who is writing this blog post. In fact, the person who wrote the previous sentence isn’t the same person who is writing this sentence.

Each of us is continually changing. We wrongly believe there is some essential core to our being that remains the same.

Sure, some of our characteristics are relatively stable, especially physical ones. I was born male, grew up male, and will die male. (Some people change their sex, though.) And discovering my high school graduation speech a week ago, as I wrote about on my HinesSight blog in “My 1966 high school graduation speech describes the United States in 2026,” reminded me that from an early age, I’ve been an avid writer who is pretty good at discussing complex subjects in a readable fashion.

Still…

Looking through the pages of Life is Fair, I realized that much of what I said in that book isn’t what I believe now. Yet at the time I wrote Life is Fair, I sincerely believed in reincarnation, karma that survives our bodily death, and other supernatural teachings of Radha Soami Satsang Beas. In 2007 I talked about the fact that while I still believe in the cause and effect aspect of karma, since cause and effect is how the world works, reincarnation and past lives strike me as deeply implausible. See “Life is fair. Here’s why.”

Reading the passage above, what the woman read aloud in her Instagram post, I felt almost guilty that I’d promulgated a conception of the cosmos that presents “bad karma” as the reason someone is despairing or depressed. Now this strikes me as a blame the victim mentality that can make people feel responsible for their unhappiness because of what they’d supposedly done in past lives.

I don’t want people to feel that they’re responsible for their happiness or sadness. After all, I don’t believe in free will. Which fits with my continued belief in cause and effect, the core of karma, minus the supernatural side of karma theory. Stuff happens in our life. We respond to those happenings. Then more stuff happens. And we keep on responding.

That’s life in a nutshell, from birth until death. Life is fair since there are reasons for everything that happens. However, we aren’t in control of those reasons. They are part of the complex, interconnected, impossible to grasp web of life that not only surrounds us, but is us.

On the positive side, I feel good that almost certainly, some people have become vegetarians after reading Life is Fair. I’ve been a vegetarian since 1970. Eating meat or fish is abhorrent to me. Sticking flesh into my mouth seems really weird, almost akin to cannibalism. One of my favorite blog posts is “I changed a Bollywood actor’s life… turning him vegetarian.”


Discover more from Church of the Churchless

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

9 Comments

  1. sant64

    Reading your RSSB works, I see the very same person with the very same beliefs. You just can’t see it.

    “That’s life in a nutshell, from birth until death. Life is fair since there are reasons for everything that happens. However, we aren’t in control of those reasons. They are part of the complex, interconnected, impossible to grasp web of life that not only surrounds us, but is us.”

    That outlook almost precisely mirrors your thesis in Life is Fair.

    Perhaps you’d counter that you’ve evolved from soft to hard determinism. But after telling us you now believe karma is an illusion, here you are ending your essay by lauding the moral merits of vegetarianism. That’s a tacit acknowledgement that you actually do believe that our actions (karma) carry consequences, and that we all have agency to make moral choices.

    • Obviously I’m much more familiar with my past and current beliefs than you are. Which is why I know you’re wrong.

      I used to believe in God. Now I don’t. I used to believe in the supernatural. Now I don’t. I used to believe in reincarnation. Now I don’t. I used to believe the RSSB guru was God in Human Form. Now I don’t. I used to believe that what happened to us in this life was largely or entirely caused by what happened to us in past lives. Now I don’t.

      All those previous beliefs are reflected in my books, other than Break Free of Dogma. They sure seem way different from what I believe now. I feel like a very different person now. More open-minded. Less rigid. No longer like a special person chosen by God to return to “heaven.” But you’re welcome to believe otherwise. Just wanted to point out how wrong you are.

      • Um

        Maybe it doesn’t matter that much what you believe…but … th sort of belief you had / have.

        I think that I have to open ” the WILL to believe” again and see what William James had to say about it … as I do remember that he wrote about different sorts and qualities.

        May be you never really believed a thing

        God knows.

        Up to the room with my forgotten books.

      • Spencer Tepper

        Hi Brian Ji
        The foundational character remains the same. The speaker in the book is a pragmatist, a rational thinker, a clear thinker and speaker and writer. A person who has always believed in science and fact. And who expected the path to meet those conditions on the physical terms of that character’s thinking.

        It was inevitable that such a thinker, depending upon sheer faith, would tire. Your beliefs may have changed in many things, but the character is the same.

        Feed that character a different experience and the same pragmatic mind would be in a different position.

        All is good.

        This is where we are all supposed to be and we can only do our best from this point to our next.

  2. Spencer Tepper

    Hi Brian Ji
    Life is not fair.
    And writing such statements as
    “we get what we deserve” has always been a big turn off for me.

    After all, what the hell do we know?

    You wrote later that this feels more like a “blame the victim” logic. And it sure feels that way.

    But, stepping back this all was written for an audience very prouf of their own thinking, an audience that silently believes in the perfection of their own thinking, and the righteousness of their reasoning. For that audience, they shouldn’t be blaming anyone. But maybe showing them the mote in their own eye, their own faults, is the way to get them to let go of blame of any kind, and embrace forgiveness as a pathway to personal liberation.

    But as you rightly point out, it can be seen as a justification for ignoring the plight of those around us.

    Dr Johnson wrote like this also, for a proud western audience.

    But it is in the writing of the Saints, his own Master, The Great Master Sawan Singh, that we find a deeper message.

    No one is to blame, but no one can help you unless you help yourself.

    Then, the whole of creation will assist you, though there will be trials, and hence the necessity for an incredible living friend who is absolutely loyal to you, and for whom forgiveness isn’t even an issue. We are all here not by our own choice, but let’s not make it worse for anyone else.

    Let’s help where we can, as good human beings, and find the strength, power, inspiration and friendship within to do all this and go to our true home.

    No one deserves this. We all deserve to go home. The dinner at realize it, the better or own life becomes.

  3. Spencer Tepper

    The sooner we realize it, the better our own life, and the life of all around us becomes.

    We are all passengers on the titanic here.

    It doesn’t matter what clothes you wear, your beliefs, your lives and hates, you addictions and whatever you find truthful here. All that is temporary and the ship is sinking deeper and deeper into the dark and cold void.

    Escape is for everyone. We all came from the same home. We are all brothers and sisters (and every variation in between) from the exact same Father. No one has a different set of parents, a different true home.

    So, nothing else matters but our return.

    Universally, though each on their own time.

    We work our way back, we master the art of rising above, going within with Master in the palm of a great soul.

    No one is too blame. We are all victims, but of an unknown past.

    And the path to freedom is built right into every single human being.

  4. Ronald

    Oh ok now Gurinder’s followers all want to be president or something in politics like him. And btw life isn’t fair and never has been. Only a fool would think so!

  5. sm68

    When I was young my siblings and I used to say ‘it’s not fair ‘ when something happened that we didn’t like, such as being denied an ice cream or something else kids love. My dad always used to say, ‘well, life isn’t fair and the sooner you get used to it the better’
    🙂

  6. lifeisnotfair@gmail.com

    Given all that you have said and posted here about RS, I am always surprised you have not asked RS Beas to withdraw your book, since that very book leads people to the path that you left and which you continually criticize. BTW, I think the title itself is one of the worst titles of a book I have ever seen, since it is so obviously not the case. But one still wonders why you allow your very book to lead others to the very path that you think isn’t right. Ego? Hubris?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *