Godlessness is a true culture of life

I've never understood how fundamentalist Christians in the United States are able to argue that they're supporters of a culture of life, while the rest of us godless heathens apparently favor a culture of death.

The way I see it, the truth is exactly opposite.

Those who don't believe in God, an afterlife, or commandments handed down by a distant divinity are much more likely to favor individual actions, and collective social policies, that favor life over death.

For example, here in Oregon a jury currently is deliberating whether the parents of 15 month old Ava Worthington are guilty of manslaughter for letting her die of a treatable infection because their Christian religious beliefs taught that prayer is the solution to medical problems, not doctors.

To me, they're guilty, no matter what the jury legally decides.

What parents would stand by and watch their child die when they could have easily saved her? Answer: fundamentalists who surely believe that now Ava is in the hands of Jesus and God is pleased with them for choosing death over life.

If this life each of us is living now is the only existence we'll ever have, then every moment is almost (or exactly) infinitely precious. Life shouldn't be discarded lightly based on an evidence-less assumption that there will more of it to enjoy after the body dies.

This usually isn't talked about explicitly, but I'm convinced that the beliefs of the Christian majority in this country go a long way toward explaining why dying often is taken so lightly by Americans.

Grieving parents of a soldier killed in Iraq, or the wife of a man killed in a mountain climbing accident, will say in an interview, "I know he's in a better place now."

Actually, they don't know this. They believe this.

And that belief supports a culture of death — in that a foreshortened life isn't viewed as having taken away a good part of a person's only chance to experience living, but merely transferred their existence to another domain of reality: heaven.

Now, I'm not arguing that progressive political policies, which I generally favor, are more in tune with a culture of life than conservative policies. (Others have, though.)

I'm simply suggesting that both individual and societal moral decisions would be made more wisely in the absence of metaphysical assumptions about an afterlife, God's will, and such. What we know is that people are born, and eventually they die.

What happens to an individual, if anything, before birth and after death is a belief — not a knowing. If living a life here on Earth is needlessly sacrificed, cut short, or considered insignificant for any other-worldly reason, that's wrong.

Which is why I see religion as supporting a culture of death, not life.

(For another perspective on this, in a continuation here's a recent comment from Adam on a post about death and non-existence, followed by my response to him.)

Support individual searching for meaning

My Indisputable Churchless Truths have been holding up pretty well, judging from the comments on them so far. So I've been pondering their implications for how I, and others, react to peoples' descriptions of what they find meaningful in life.One of the truths is:Each individual must determine, or choose, his or her own meaning of life, because life's meaning isn't a given like gravity or electromagnetism.Religions consider otherwise, of course. A true believer finds the meaning of life in the Bible, Koran, Vedas, Guru Granth Sahib, or the words of some revered spiritual teacher. Yet this still is a choice…

Truths about religion’s falseness

Hey, it's a pleasant Oregon summer evening. I've got a full cup of hot organic coffee sitting next to my laptop. Seems like a good time to come up with some Indisputable Churchless Truths."Indisputable" is the caffeine speaking. I'm pretty sure that these truths will be disputed. In fact, I hope they are. After all, they're churchless truths. Which means, they're open to debate, discussion, disputation. If you don't agree with any of them, or want to add a truth, comment away. Just have a good reason. That said, you'll note that I don't supply reasons for the truthfulness of…

Churchless lesson: a tale of two fairs

What can fair-going teach us about churchlessness? Glad I asked. I'll answer my own question...Thursday I went to the Marion County Fair here in Salem to relieve my wife of crushing boredom -- a four hour shift on a slow day womaning a booth sponsored by an earth-friendly organization she belongs to. I chatted with her for a while, then explored the fair. At the other end of the exhibit hall I came across some sort of senior citizen "athletic" event, the quotation marks being justified by this bean bag toss nature of the activity. Apparently senior centers were competing…

Bruce Lee’s Taoist life lessons

Most people are familiar with Bruce Lee as a famous martial artist. Lee's philosophical accomplishments are less well known. But they are part and parcel of his Jeet Kune Do artistry.This morning I couldn't resist -- I jumped ahead and read the final chapter in Daniele Bolelli's "On the Warrior's Path: Philosophy, Fighting, and Martial Arts Mythology."  It's called "Epistemological Anarchism, The Philosophy of Jeet Kune Do."Bruce Lee's philosophy is rooted in Taoism. The past few days I've been enjoying some spirited discussion about Taoism in comment conversations on posts here and here.I've been arguing that philosophical Taoism (as contrasted…

Mysticism good. Religion bad. So says Sam Harris.

My churchlessness was wonderfully energized by Sam Harris' "The End of Faith" when it came out in 2004 -- the same year I started this blog. Harris has a philosophy degree from Stanford and is working on a doctorate in neuroscience, so he's got a balanced perspective on soft beliefs and hard facts. This morning I picked up The End of Faith and reread the almost-final "Experiments in Consciousness" chapter. I'd remembered that he'd said positive things about mysticism after trashing religion, and was curious to revisit his thoughts after five years or so.My conclusion: right on, Mr. Harris. At…

Tai Chi doesn’t have much to do with “Qi”

George asked some good questions in a comment on this recent post. I responded briefly to the Tai Chi section of his query in a comment of my own, but wanted to reply more fully to these thoughts:Why do even the most churchless on here appear to follow a spiritual practice of some kind? If truly churchless, why not be wholly secular and skeptical, devoid of any and all spiritual belief. If on the other hand such spirituality is indeed practiced and tolerated, why not the same extended to other mystic traditions or religions? Christianity and RS [Radha Soami] have…

Get bodily wild this Fourth of July

It's Independence Day here in the United States. July 4 is a great time to remind yourself, no matter where you are in the world, "I'm free -- independent of religious fantasies."This afternoon I'm going to ride my newly-beloved Suzuki scooter through some beautiful countryside to nearby Independence, where a Fourth of July celebration is happening (seems appropriate to visit Independence, Oregon on Independence Day).A very bodily activity. As if any of us can do anything else, so long as we're alive. What isn't bodily? Meditation sure is. Ditto for every other form of supposed "spiritual" practice. Yesterday I started…

Confirmed: God is gay

Makes sense to me: In nature, homosexuality, bisexuality, and omni-sexuality are ubiquitous. God created nature, and is reflected in nature. Thus, as Mark Morford demonstrates, God is gay. Somewhat, at least.And gayness is entirely natural -- as is every other form of sexuality. Check off another instance where religions are wrong.

Right on, Richard Feynman

Thanks to Pharyngula, I was able to start my day off with an inspiring RIchard Feynman paean to reality, science, doubt, uncertainty, and godlessness.Feynman was an amazing physicist. And this short video shows that he also was an amazing person.

Science is divine if nature is God’s creation

OK, that's a big "if" in this blog post title. But let's assume for a non-churchless moment that God is real, and God created the physical universe.So here we are, in God's marvelous creation. Living, breathing, pondering what existence is all about.Part of that pondering is something called science. It studies the natural world -- including the portion we call "humanity." Science is the best means known to man (and woman) for sorting out what's true about the universe, and what isn't.Why, then, are so many believers in a personal God who created the universe so mistrustful of a discipline,…

Science-bashers, read this before you comment

Yeah, I admit it: I"ve been getting a bit testy lately, blog-wise. (Summer-wise, life is great, what with a new camera and scooter to play with in the Oregon sunshine.)If you read through some of the exchanges between Phil and me on my "Who cares if God exists?" post, you'll find a touch (well, maybe a slam) of irritation in my comments on Phil's comments.You see, what gripes my churchless non-soul as much as anything is when science-bashers resort to spurious, irrational, shape-shifting arguments that can briefly sound good on the surface, but quickly break apart into Huh? fragments of…

Faith — the embrace of mystery

"Faith." We use this word so often. Yet most of us haven't given much thought to what it means. I enjoyed browsing through a bunch of definitions of faith submitted by commenters to a New York Times online piece.This is the first submission.The suspension of reason and rationality for a dream.This is the second submission.Faith is knowing something should be true, being certain it is, and having no insight into one’s collisions with reality.Reality is wrong. Other people are wrong. Why can’t they see what I see? It’s all about failures to re-interpret one’s original misinterpretation of experience. Faith is…

Who cares if God exists?

Over on my "Nature is real, religion is illusion" post, today Phil asked a good question in a comment:Ending on a question note, would anyone on this blog significantly change the way they lived their lives, if it became proven, without shadow of doubt, that God existed? (or for that matter, proven without shadow of doubt that a God of any form did NOT exist?)I've been pondering along some similar lines recently, so was primed to offer up some answers. But first, the question needs quite a bit of work -- as others already have noted in their own comment…

Faith-healing parents let child die: religion is guilty

Here's a passionate answer to those who ask, "What's wrong with letting religious people believe anything they want?"Because innocent children die! Religion is dangerous! It makes people act like idiots!Case closed. Religion is guilty.But there still will be a trial here in Oregon, where prosecutors have charged Carl and Raylene Worthington with manslaughter and criminal mistreatment in the death of their 15-month old daughter, Ava.I hope they punish these horrible parents as harshly as the law allows. Which is more than six years in prison. Not enough, but hopefully that will discourage other religious fundamentalists from forcing innocent children to…

Tai Chi vs. Shabd Yoga — I name a winner

I love questions. Especially those I can answer. Here's one that Todd Chambers asked me a few days ago via a comment on a post about giving up Buddhism and Zen.So Brian, on the subject of Tai Chi, I wanted to ask you if you could say which practice has seemed more rewarding for you: Shabda Yoga or Tai Chi? Or do you have a preference?Interesting question. I diligently practiced the Radha Soami Satsang Beas version of Surat Shabd Yoga (a.k.a. Sant Mat) for over thirty years, including a whole lot of daily meditation. And for about five years I've…

Nature is real, religion is illusion

Here's one big change that churchlessness has produced in me: I no longer believe that this world -- where all of us are living now -- somehow is less real than an unseen theoretical heaven or higher realm of the cosmos.In fact, it's hard for me to accept that I ever believed this, because it doesn't make any sense. What would make someone turn away from what is right in front of them and try to embrace something imaginary that has no demonstrable evidence of its existence? Short answer: religion.Or, some sort of mental illness. In either case, the nature-denier…

No psychic abilities found in Twitter study

Darn, I was hoping that my occasional Twittering had some cosmic significance. But an article in New Scientist, "First Twitter experiment probes belief in the paranormal," describes a study that showed a lack of metaphysical ability among 7000 people who signed up for a scientific use of Twitter.The formal part of the study, which took place over four days, tested both whether the group as a whole was psychic and whether believers outperformed disbelievers. On each day I travelled to a randomly selected location and asked everyone to send tweets describing their thoughts and impressions about the location. In the…