Soul of the Samurai: so simple

For about fifteen years I've been practicing martial arts. "Practice" is the operative word. I've always felt like a beginner, because whenever I've learned something a fresh realization follows almost immediately: there's so much more to learn.What I enjoy the most about martial arts -- I started with traditional Shotokan karate, moved to a mixed style, and now am focused on Tai Chi -- is what they teach you about yourself.There's a deep connection between Zen/Taoism and Japanese/Chinese martial arts. I've understood this better after taking up Tai Chi, which basically is Taoism reflected in movement.This isn't rocket spiritual science,…

Primal mystery: the birth of consciousness

I ponder death a lot. The notion of me not existing any more isn't appealing, to say the least. It isn't my body that I'm afraid of losing. It's my awareness, or consciousness. I'd be cool with living on as a disembodied soul, so long as I was aware of it.But ...being extinguished completely ...forever ...not a trace of consciousness left. Yikes! Some say that it isn't possible for us to contemplate death, not in a realistic fashion. We know what life is like because it's being experienced as we envision death. Yet non-existence obviously can't be imagined, since imagining…

Mind: a mirror or nothing?

I've been thinking about this awareness watching awareness thing, the subject of a previous post. Of course, I've been thinking with my mind. And mind is at the root of the whole thing.So I'm pondering what pondering is about, in much the same fashion as Michael Langford says that awareness needs to watch awareness in order to become aware of what awareness is.Pretty damn confusing. But seemingly important.Because the debate over whether consciousness (and hence reality, since a reality with no one aware of it is non-existent for us) is one'ish or two'ish is central to religion, spirituality, philosophy --…

Is awareness watching awareness the highest truth?

I'm always looking for shortcuts to enlightenment, bliss, nirvana -- whatever you want to call it. For a long time I was on a spiritual path. Paths take time to travel. I'm too old for paths. I want to see the promised land right goddamn now! Not after death. Not after years of meditation practice. Now! So my attention perked up when I got an email today from an occasional Church of the Churchless visitor who said, in part:A guy by the name of Michael Langford, (who I recently ran across) says that he had followed Sri Ramana's 'self inquiry'…

Kabir was too wild for religion

Kabir was a fifteenth century North Indian mystic poet. I've called him a "patron saint of spiritual independence." Like Steve Martin, he was a wild and crazy guy. Yet you wouldn't know that from how some faiths, such as Sikhism and Sant Mat, try to tame Kabir and confine him within a religious tradition. In a recent post I said:But Sant Mat, in its modern form, lacks the sort of pin that punctures the dualistic, self-righteous, dogmatic bubble. ("Modern," because the 15th century Kabir, who is held up as a Sant Mat saint, did a great job of pinpricking in…

Reasons for my belief (and disbelieving)

I thought I'd try to glean some broader meaning out of "My strange RSSB initiation story," since that tale I told a few days ago was so personal. Maybe that isn't possible. Perhaps my thirty-eight year journey from devout true believer to skeptical churchless agnostic is so idiosyncratic, it doesn't hold any lessons for someone else. Well, let's see. I'll take a stab at resurrecting a few reasons (so far as I'm aware of them) that led me to join a religious group. I'll also try to briefly share how those reasons morphed as my involvement with Radha Soami Satsang…

My strange RSSB initiation story

A few days ago I talked about how I came to have doubts about the guru-centered faith, Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB), that I followed diligently for over thirty years.

One of the commenters on that post asked a question about why I was so gullible in accepting teachings that, in retrospect, seemed so unlikely to be true.

I responded that all of us believe things which we’re mistaken about. Discarding worn-out beliefs and accepting new ones is part of life’s maturation process. I also said that to attempt to answer that question I’d need to tell the tale of how I came to be initiated into the RSSB fold.

This is a strange story. I don’t think I’ve ever shared it on the Internet, though I’ve told it verbally quite a few times.

Satsangis (which is how RSSB initiates describe themselves) like to talk about how they came on “the path.” You get bonus points for the unlikeliness of the events that led to applying and being accepted for initiation by the guru.

For example, moving in to an apartment that was completely vacated by the previous owner except for a single RSSB book, which, when opened, instantly speaks to the eventual initiate.

I’ve heard many stories along these lines, as have other satsangis. Yet often when I’ve finished telling my own, I hear: “Wow, that’s the strangest initiation story ever.”

Not having made much progress in losing my ego, that gives me a certain satisfaction. Guess I’d rather be strange than nondescript. So I’m pleased to retell my tale, attempting to be as brief as possible (always tough for me, given my writing style).

I can justify the likely rather considerable length of this post by the lesson that it may hold for others. However, I can’t say what that lesson is, since people will look upon this story in idiosyncratic ways.

A RSSB true believer, which I no longer am, will probably think, “Ah, the guru works in such marvelous ways.” A skeptic’s thoughts will run more along the lines of, “Fooled once, fooled twice.”

Whatever. I’ll just tell it like it was. You can decide what to make of the telling. Read on, if you like.

Why I’m not a Sant Mat true believer

Fairly often I hear from people -- usually via email -- who want to know why I've "left the path." By which they mean, failed to keep on wholeheartedly believing in the Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB) teachings, which are an offshoot of Sant Mat. I respond in various ways, but usually end up saying much the same thing. To save time in the future, I thought I'd take a stab at re-stating my stock response so I could simply point to this post when the question of my supposedly heretical change of direction comes up. First, and probably also…

Jyotish astrology affirms RSSB guru

I don’t know much about astrology. I know even less than that about Jyotish astrology, which is a Hindu/Vedic system.

So I was intrigued when I got an email from Catherine, a South African who is deeply into this stuff.

By "intrigued," I mean interested in an unfamiliar subject.

I’m highly skeptical of astrology. I’ve never heard a reasonable, or even semi-reasonable, theory about why it might work.

Still, I’m open to the notion that forces beyond our usual understanding could impact us. And I’ll admit to liking the one indepth chart that was done for me quite a few years ago (a friend recently did another, but I haven’t learned the details yet).

Catherine is an initiate of Radha Soami Satsang Beas, as I am. However, I’ve become a RSSB heretic as regards the dogmatic religious aspects of this India-based organization.

Catherine is considerably more positive about Radha Soami Satsang Beas, including the current guru of the group: Gurinder Singh Dhillon. As you can read below, she prepared a Jyotish analysis of Gurinder Singh and found that astrology confirms his guru status.

My reaction: interesting. And I’ll leave it at that.

I don’t see much of a downside to believing in astrology. The people I know who do believe in it clearly enjoy this art (I can’t call it a science) and consider that it enriches their understanding of life.

That’s great.

But as to whether what follows should be accepted as truth, that’s a whole other question. I simply am sharing (with Catherine’s permission); you decide. Read on…

“Religulous” warms my churchless soul

Here's a miracle: Bill Maher's anti-religion movie, Religulous, got us out of our Netflix habit and into a real movie theatre. Ensconced in Salem Cinema's alternative artsy atmosphere, munching on parmesan cheese-drenched popcorn and sipping a vanilla Italian soda, my wife and I relished Maher's skewering of the ridiculous side of religiosity. You can read about the flick on Wikipedia, which includes a summary of reviews good and bad. And You Tube has an interview with Maher that reflects the flavor of his movie. I enjoyed Maher's preaching the power and glory of the gospel "I don't know." For me,…

Religion places bad bets on the left brain

Sometimes you hear, "He's a left brain person" or "Creativity comes from the right brain." Neuroscience is a lot more complicated than that, but it's still fascinating to read descriptions of the specialized functions in the two sides of the brain. Such as Michael Gazzaniga's "Spheres of Influence" in the June/July issue of Scientific American Mind. He describes research on split-brain patients where the major connection between the two hemispheres, the corpus collusum, is severed in order to treat intractable epilepsy. This allowed Gazzaniga and his collegues to study how the two hemispheres dealt with a problem that has a…

Be thankful you’re not dead

It's Thanksgiving Day in the United States. In the rest of the world, I gather, it's a regular day. The real point of Thanksgiving seems to be to overeat, spend time with family members, and rest up for shopping tomorrow (big sales start in a few hours). My wife has made a couple of pumpkin pies. I've got a vegan Tofurky cooking in the oven. There's thankfulness pouring out of every pore of our daily newspapers and Internet news sites. I'm not big on holidays. I don't like following a societal script. Be thankful on Thanksgiving. Be worshipful on Christmas.…

Why EnlightenNext is so irritating

Dear God, deliver me from New Agey, Ken Wilber'ish, pseudo-evolutionary, integral philosophy B.S. like what just popped into my email inbox, courtesy of Andrew Cohen and his EnlightenNext crew. I just said that I had mixed feelings about Ken Wilber. Cohen's YouTube video adds quite a bit of weight to the absurd side of my attitude. If you've got eight minutes you want to waste, take a look. I can see why Cohen changed the name of his magazine from "What is Enlightenment?" Because talk like I heard on the video sure would earn a big fat "Not this!" from…

No need to live life fully. Just live.

"Living life to the fullest" is an adage that used to mean much more to me than it does now. In my true believing days I'd be anxious that I was missing out on the purpose of earthly existence. Which I took to be: pursuing a spiritual path that would lead me out of the illusion of earthly existence. So, in accord with the teachings of Radha Soami Satsang Beas (an Indian organization led by a guru), I diligently meditated for several hours a day and did my best to not get attached to worldly entanglements. I failed, of course.…

Trapped in the goal of having no goal

One of my pet peeves is how often I hear, "Brian, you think too much!" Almost always I'm told this by a true believer (generally in Sant Mat, my previous faith) who is using his or her mind to express that thought. So obviously that person isn't opposed to thinking, because they're doing it when they tell me "You think too much." What they really are saying is that they don't like what I'm thinking. Which, when expressed in a Church of the Churchless blog post, often has to do with the futility of religious believing. Those beliefs, whether Christian,…

Spiritual ego worse than worldly ego

Losing the ego... what's up with that? In most religions, particularly Eastern ones, this is supposed to be a supreme goal of spirituality. Yet no one has ever seen an "ego," much less the absence of one. I've come to feel that "losing the ego" is one of those phrases that sounds like it means something -- and gets repeated in sermons, satsangs, and such as if it did -- but actually points to an absurdity. How would a person without an ego, a sense of "I," personal desire, look? How would he or she be different from other people?…

Beyond Ken Wilber’s bounded reality

I've got mixed feelings about Ken Wilber. Sometimes he strikes me as a self-absorbed guy who's fervently marketing his Integral Philosophy as the answer to every question, even though it strikes me as a conceptual exercise without much reality meat behind it. Then I read something Wilber has written and resonate with it. (A sampling of my divided opinions toward Wilber is here, here, and here.) I wasn't planning to renew my subscription to "What Is Enlightenment?" when the magazine changed it's question mark spots and became EnlightenNext, an even more brazen vanity massager for Ken Wilber and Andrew Cohen…

Seven days of sex — religion I can get behind

Or, on top of. That's one of the great things about this story of a mega-church pastor urging his congregation (married only, please) to have sex for seven days straight. It lends itself to double entendres. I watched a story about "Thou Shalt Not Abstain" on CNN and couldn't resist getting out my Flip VIdeo camera and beaming it up to You Tube. My favorite part is about 1:10 in, when a woman says that the pastor hadn't touched on this subject before. At least, "not in so much depth." Giggle, giggle. It's refreshing to see religion addressing down-to-earth human…