Ken Wilber’s error: mistaking personal experience for universal reality
I used to enjoy reading Ken Wilber's writings. Then, I didn't. As I said in a 2009 post: I've got a love-hate thing going with Ken Wilber, a prolific writer and creative thinker who relentlessly preaches the marvels of an Integral approach to understanding reality. Sometimes I like what Wilber says (see here and here). Sometimes I don't (see here and here). David Lane's essay, "Ken Wilber's Eye: Exploring the Danger of Theological Reifications," encapsulates my reasons for don't. Basically, Wilber has an annoying egocentric attitude. I talked about this in Integral Egos Gone Wild: WIlber and Cohen relish worship. First, Wilber and Cohen assume that God is real…
